There's an interesting debate going on at Kevin Keohane's blog about the ethics of selling conference airtime to agencies who sponsor.
Are we at simply being a bit too high-minded when we bar sponsors from presenting at our conferences? We'd make more money - but would it make for a better conference?
We're currently mostly liking...
- a shel of my former self
- Aimee
- Alex Manchester - Web 2.0 guru
- Allan Jenkins
- Casey’s Blog
- Live Long and Prosper
- euansemple.com - The Obvious?
- Karl at IBM
- Katie Moffat
- Kevin Keohane
- Kilobox - musings on new media
- Lee Smith
- Les Potter
- Life through a 2.0 lens
- Martin Ross
- Matt O'Neill
- Niall Cook
- Russell and Social Media
- Shel Holtz & Neville Hobson
- Simply Communicate - internal communication plans and employee communication toolkits
- Sue Tupling's blog
- Talking Internal Communication...
« Nicola Horlick captures the radio station | Main | Does the 'command and control' label matter anymore? »
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Recent Posts
- We've moved
- We do EVERYTHING on our intranet
- I've moved
- Why is there no other life in the Universe?
- A couple of recommendations
- Over-egging the pudding
- Does the 'command and control' label matter anymore?
- Should agencies pay their way to the conference lectern?
- Nicola Horlick captures the radio station
- Paradise found
Marc, you know where I stand.
Maintain the high ground! Put on what's the best thinking out there, regardless of who/where it comes from (not just those who have the wallet to sponsor their speech).
"People will remember quality long after price is forgotten."
Posted by: Kevin Keohane | December 18, 2008 at 11:41 AM